Ligand/Receptor-mediated Cell Communication Alteration Causes the Lung Inflammation Microenvironment and the Redistribution of Inter-tissue Immune Cells in COVID-19 Patients (preprint)

How SARS-CoV-2 causes disturbances of the lung microenvironment and systemic immune response remains a mystery. Here, we first analyze detailedly paired single-cell transcriptome data of the lungs, blood and bone marrow of two patients who died of COVID-19. Second, our results demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 infection significantly increases the cellular communication frequency between AT1/AT2 cells and highly inflammatory myeloid cells, and induces the pulmonary inflammation microenvironment, and drives the disorder of fibroblasts, club and ciliated cells, thereby causing the increase of pulmonary fibrosis and mucus accumulation. Third, our works reveal that the increase of the lung T cell infiltration is mainly recruited by myeloid cells through certain ligands/receptors (ANXA1/FPR1, C5AR1/RPS19 and CCL5/CCR1), rather than AT1/AT2. Fourth, we find that some ligands and receptors such as ANXA1/FPR1, CD74/COPA, CXCLs/CXCRs, ALOX5/ALOX5AP, CCL5/CCR1, are significantly activated and shared among patients’ lungs, blood and bone marrow, implying that dysregulated ligands and receptors may cause the migration, redistribution and the inflammatory storm of immune cells in different tissues. Overall, our study reveals a latent mechanism by which the disorders of ligands and receptors caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection drive cell communication alteration, the pulmonary inflammatory microenvironment and systemic immune responses across tissues in COVID-19 patients.

Clinical Efficacy of Convalescent Plasma Therapy on Treating COVID-19 Patients: Evidence from Matched Study and a Meta-Analysis (preprint)

Background: COVID-19 has infected tens of millions of people worldwide since its pandemic. CPT is one of the promising treatment methods and is favored by more and more researchers. However, the clinical efficacy and safety of CPT in COVID-19 remains unclear.Methods: We performed a matched control study by PSM analysis (including 163 cases with CPT and 163 controls with the standard treatment) and meta-analysis (including 498 cases and 557 controls) estimate the clinical efficacy and security of CPT and COVID-19, which will help inform clinical management of COVID-19 infection.Results: We found that days of hospital stay in case with CPT groups were significantly higher than matched control group (P< 0.0001). A significant reduction in mortality (OR= 0.496, 95%CI= 0.342-0.719, P< 0.0001) was found in the CPT group compared with the standard treatment group, and a true positive result was also found in sequential analysis. In terms of adverse events, sequential analysis found a false positive, although meta-analysis found a significant increase in the incidence of adverse events in patients treated with CPT compared to the control group. No differences between the two groups in terms of length of stay, improvement of clinical symptoms, and discharge were found.Conclusions: This study is the first to systematically review and meta-analysis the efficacy and safety of CPT in patients with COVID-19 in the largest sample size. Our results showed that CPT could significantly reduce the mortality rate of COVID-19 patients, and there was no significant increase in the incidence of adverse events. These data provide evidence favoring the efficacy and safety of CPT as a therapeutic agent in COVID-19 patients and provide comprehensive reference for COVID-19 treatment.Funding Statement: This work was supported by Scientific Research Project of Jiangsu Commission of Health (H2019065), Key Foundation of Wuhan Huoshenshan Hospital (2020[18]), Key Research & Development Program of Jiangsu Province (BE2018713), Medical Innovation Project of Logistics Service (18JS005).Declaration of Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest with this work.Ethics Approval Statement: The authors were approved by the ethics committee of Huoshenshan hospital, and were conducted in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and its amendments. All participants provided written informed consent for the collection of samples and their subsequent analysis.

Aspergillus But Not Candida: Fatal Fungus Infection in COVID-19 Critical Patients (preprint)

Objectives: Earlier researches suggested patients should be routinely screened for bacteria and fungi infection after COVID-19 being confirmed. Here, we enrolled 236 patients with COVID-19 to analyze the clinical characteristics, fungal strains, mortality, and laboratory data of different groups.Design: Single center retrospective studyPatients: A total of 236 COVID-19 patients from Huoshenshan Hospital were included in this study, consisting of 14(6%) died cases, 222(94%) discharged cases.Results: The result revealed that 5 mortality in positive group were all related to aspergillus infection while candida infection rarely caused death. Aspergillus was most common in non-survivors while candida was most common in survivors. In terms of interleukin-6 (IL6), viral loads, nucleic acid clearance time, etc, fungal serologically positive group had a higher level than negative group.Conclusions: Non-survivors of Covid-19 with fungal infection were almost associated with aspergillus infection. Aspergillus infection, instead of candida infection might be fatal for critical ill patients with COVID-19. There is great significance to carry out routine screening for fungal infection especially for critical patients to enable early treatment to be implemented.Funding Statement: This study was financially supported by grants Key Foundation of Wuhan Huoshenshan Hospital (2020[18]), Key Research& Development Program of Jiangsu Province (BE2018713), Medical Innovation Project of Logistics Service (18JS005).Declaration of Interests: The authors declare no competing interests.Ethics Approval Statement: This study was approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of Wuhan Huoshenshan Hospital (No. HSSLL011). Written informed consent was obtained from each patient.

Diabetes Patients of COVID-19 Infection Treated with Convalescent Plasma Transfusion in Wuhan, China (preprint)

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2 had spread all over the world, causing public health emergency. Although the diagnosis for COVID-19 such as nucleic acid test and antibody detection have been well defined, there is still a big gap of knowledge regarding for COVID-19 patients receiving convalescent plasma transfusion (CPT) therapy, especially patients with comorbidity of diabetes. Method: In this study, out of 3059 COVID-19 patients admitted in Wuhan Huoshenshan Hospital of China, we described the characteristics of 39 diabetes patients receiving the transfusion of ABO-compatible convalescent plasma, and compared the baseline information and clinical outcome with that of 328 diabetes patients receiving traditional treatment. Results: It was found that the intervention of CPT therapy was effective and beneficial for COVID-19 patients, including severe or critical patients with comorbidity of diabetes, without obvious adverse effects observing during the treatments. The CPT therapy significantly improved the clinical outcome of diabetes patients with COVID-19 infection, especially the duration based on six categories compared to the patients with traditional therapy. Conclusions: This study not only provided a better understanding of COVID-19 in diabetes people receiving CPT, but also highlighted the CPT therapy was helpful for COVID-19 patients with comorbidity of diabetes.